“The only thing that can be predicted with certainty is that soon your company will be called upon to change in a way it could not have imagined.”

Gary Hamel, author of Humanocracy

—

Every team talks about “strategy.” Few put it into practice.

Over the past few months, I’ve gathered the most common challenges: priorities that change every week, confusion between KPIs and KRs, fluid roles, firefighting, and never enough time. The problem isn’t the complexity of the world; it’s the absence of criteria for making choices.

Strategy is often confused with planning or a list of goals. That’s why it ends up in slide decks—or worse, in a spreadsheet.

In twenty years of work, I’ve seen one constant: strategies that work don’t come from a brilliant idea by the CEO, but from the discipline of making choices and standing by them over time.

The discipline of choosing, of giving things up, of aligning everyday actions with a clear idea of what it means to win.

The discipline of understanding that execution doesn’t come after strategy, but is how strategy takes shape.

The even rarer discipline of recognizing that no decision is forever: the world changes, customers change, and our beliefs must change just as quickly.

I decided to write a five-chapter series bringing together twenty-five fundamental principles that guide my work and that of hundreds of teams who now use MAKE PROGRESS® as a goal-based strategy execution system.

These aren’t immutable laws, but principles no company I know has ever been able to ignore.

Each principle is a lens through which to see more clearly, to distinguish what truly matters from what distracts.

Here’s the publication schedule.

Chapter I – The nature of strategic choice
Published Monday, October 20 at 7:00, in this note
Every strategy begins with giving something up. Understanding what it really means to “win” and where it’s worth playing is where it all begins.

Chapter II – Internal coherence
Published Monday, October 27 at 7:00, read it here.
One isolated choice isn’t enough. Value comes from connections: between capabilities, metrics, incentives, and collective behavior.

Chapter III – The discipline of action
Published Monday, November 3 at 7:00, read it here.
Execution isn’t the second half of strategy: it’s its proving ground. Priorities, budgets, and decision-making rhythms are strategy itself.

Chapter IV – Learning over time.
Published Monday, November 10 at 7:00, read it here.
Strategies don’t work forever. The ability to learn faster than your competitors is the only defense possible.

Chapter V – NO SPOILERS
Monday, November 17 at 7:00

This series aims to give you a grammar for thinking rigorously.
Because strategy isn’t an exercise in creativity, but an exercise in clarity.

Invite a colleague to subscribe so they don’t miss the next emails.

Chapter I. The nature of strategic choice.

Law 1
Strategy is a choice.

Without giving something up, there is no direction.

Strategy begins when ambiguity ends.

As long as an organization is trying to be “flexible,” “all-encompassing,” or “open to every possibility,” it doesn’t yet have a strategy; it only has intentions.

Choosing means accepting the reality of constraints: resources, time, attention, and expertise. Every time you say “yes” to something, you say “no” to many other options. This sacrifice, often experienced as a loss, is actually the first creative act of strategic thinking.

A strategy isn’t about “being the best,” but about deciding how and where to play in order to gain a sustainable advantage. Any company can grow for a while through enthusiasm and talent; few manage to do so consistently. The difference lies in the clarity of the choices made and upheld.

The absence of choice is the root of almost every failed strategy. When everything is important, nothing really is.
Effective leaders don’t seek consensus; they seek clarity.
They have the courage to decide not only what to do, but above all what to stop doing.

Choosing narrows the horizon. But it’s precisely within that constraint that the freedom to win is born.

Law 2
You can’t win without defining what “winning” means.

Aspiration is the North Star that guides every other decision.

Every organization says it wants to “win,” but few know what they really mean.

Win where, for whom, and how?

If you can’t answer clearly, energy is scattered in contradictory directions: every project seems useful, every initiative seems strategic, until you realize that none of them really is.

A winning aspiration isn’t a motivational slogan, but a choice about meaning.

It defines the ultimate purpose of the game and measures success in a way that is consistent with your identity.

“Being the best” isn’t an aspiration that will take you far; it’s a universal illusion.

“We want to be the natural choice for business leaders who want to regain control of their growth strategy.”

An authentic aspiration has two characteristics: it provides direction (by guiding everyday decisions) and energy (by giving you a reason to play).

When victory is precisely defined, strategy stops being defensive and becomes intentional.

Without a North Star, even the best crew will end up going around in circles.

Law 3
You can’t compete everywhere.

Every growing company dreams of expansion: new markets, new customers, new channels. But growth isn’t a strategy; it’s an outcome, and it can become a trap if it isn’t guided by a clear choice of where to play.

“Where to play” is the most overlooked and most difficult decision.

It means saying: yes here, no there.

It means giving up potentially profitable segments if they don’t allow you to build a sustainable advantage. It means recognizing that no organization can be equally strong everywhere, and that true strength comes from focusing where you’re unique, not where you’re simply present.

Strategies fail more often because of excessive breadth than insufficient ambition.

Many companies want to “be for everyone,” until they discover they’re truly for no one.

Choosing where to play isn’t about limiting yourself: it’s about creating context, drawing boundaries around what winning means to you.

Only a clearly defined playing field makes it possible to build consistency, capabilities, and recognition.

Those who refuse to choose their playing field inevitably end up playing on someone else’s.

Law 4
You can’t win the same way as everyone else.

Most companies don’t fail because they lack ambition, but because they imitate too much.

As soon as a competitor succeeds, they copy them: the same model, the same tone, the same language, the same metrics. And yet, no one has ever won by repeating someone else’s move.

How to win is the most creative and most dangerous choice in strategy.

Creative, because it defines the unique mechanism for creating value for a specific audience.

Dangerous, because it requires the courage to be visibly different—and therefore open to criticism.

Winning doesn’t mean doing “better” what everyone else is doing, but doing differently what matters most.

Apple didn’t win by making faster computers, but by making design part of the very meaning of technology.

Ryanair didn’t win by cutting costs, but by redefining what people perceive as “enough to fly.”

Competitive advantage comes from a unique logic for creating value, not from a race to outdo others with the same weapons.

In the game of strategy, true victory isn’t coming first: it’s making others chase you.

Law 5
Every advantage is temporary.

But some last longer. Longevity comes from integrated capabilities, not temporary positions.

In the market, nothing lasts forever.
Every competitive advantage—whether in cost, brand, technology, or channel—is bound to erode. Not because someone gets it wrong, but because rivals learn, imitate, and innovate. Strategy isn’t about building an immutable monolith, but about maintaining a dynamic advantage over time.

The companies that survive and grow aren’t those that find a defensible position, but those that develop repeatable, adaptive capabilities.

A position can be copied.

But the ability to integrate skills, processes, and culture is much harder to imitate.

Long-term competitive advantage doesn’t come from the product, but from the system that generates it: the way people think, collaborate, and make decisions.

This explains why some companies reinvent themselves over and over, while others wear themselves out after a single success.

Treating an advantage as eternal is the beginning of its end.

Treating it as a flame to be fueled every day through learning, discipline, and consistency is what keeps it alive.

True strategy doesn’t protect the past: it prepares you to build the next advantage… until it’s time to reinvent yourself once again.

Putting it into practice

1. Identify what you need to stop doing.

Make a list of active initiatives/projects and ask yourself:
if they didn’t already exist, would I choose them today?

Anything that doesn’t pass this test is strategic deadweight.

In MAKE PROGRESS, use Project Alignment to connect initiatives with the Growth Machine and KPI Book.

2. Make the sacrifice explicit.

It’s not enough to “know internally.” Write it down:
we don’t… / we don’t serve… / we don’t invest in…
Until it’s said out loud, it isn’t a choice: it’s a silent intention.

In MAKE PROGRESS, use the Strategy Focus Onepager to crystallize all your decisions on one page that’s easy to write, share, and update.

3. Turn focus into a company asset.

If you’ve struggled to complete the first few points, I invite you to consider:
what’s the one thing that, if we do it well, makes the others possible?

In MAKE PROGRESS, define your Purpose, Vision, and Mission clearly. Have you tried working with this prompt? 

4. Put the choice on your calendar.

If your week doesn’t change, you haven’t chosen to work differently; you’ve only wished you could.

Cancel a call, a project, or a “courtesy” analysis, and free up time to work on strategy.

In MAKE PROGRESS, we call the rhythm of work Drumbeat. And when you connect it to your calendar, it becomes incredibly powerful.

5. Clarity before speed.

A slow but aligned team makes more progress than a fast but inconsistent one.
Every choice is a burst of acceleration.

Have you ever reviewed your projects using EVA Analysis? In MAKE PROGRESS, we have ready-to-use templates to help you get any situation unstuck.

Choosing is the beginning

But choosing isn’t enough: a choice is strategic only if every subsequent decision reinforces it instead of undoing it.

If strategy is just a collection of inspirational phrases, it will never work.

Strategy provides structural constraints.

Giving something up is the first act of clarity; consistency is what makes it sustainable.

In the next chapter, we’ll explore precisely what happens after the choice.

Because the next question is no longer “what do we want to do?” but “what system is needed for this choice to deliver results over time?”

I won’t give anything away, but I can tell you this: some people think they have an execution problem when they actually have an internal coherence problem. And they often don’t realize it.

If Chapter I answers the question:
“What is strategy?”

Chapter II answers:
“What makes it solid?”

See you next Monday,

ALWAYS MAKE PROGRESS ●↑

Antonio